home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.sf.science      Real and speculative aspects of SF scien      45,986 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 45,326 of 45,986   
   Thomas Koenig to Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha   
   Re: How much armour would be required fo   
   21 Feb 18 19:42:20   
   
   From: tkoenig@netcologne.de   
      
   Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha  schrieb:   
      
   > The results of Operation Crossroads suggest that the ships are rather   
   > more resistant to nuclear weapons than the crew would be. WWUU   
   > Battleships are far less than kilometers long, and while the armor is   
   > nearly 5 meters thick in places,   
      
   Certainly not.   
      
   About the thickest armor ever on a battleship was on the Yamato class,   
   which was around 410 mm.   
      
   > it's stell, not tungston. It took   
   > underwater detonations to sink them reliably. The crew, had there   
   > been one, would have been dead within hours, though, from radiation.   
      
   Even an unarmored aircraft carrier around 500 m from ground zero   
   did not sink as a result of the airburst.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca