Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 45,531 of 45,986    |
|    frank.scrooby@gmail.com to All    |
|    Re: Towards routine, reusable space laun    |
|    20 Jun 18 23:45:44    |
      Hi all,              Sorry for posting through Google but it is the closest I can get to a NTTP       server these days.              I am not an engineer, and I don't pretend to know everything about Space       Elevators (or much of anything else) but I do remember the last time the issue       was discussed on these and related news groups.              First point: Carbon fiber or long carbon walled multi-walled nano-tubes are       the required materials. Anyone bringing steel to the discussion hasn't read       anything about the subject. Or is trying to deliberately appear dense.              Second Point: the cable is not a simple cable. It is a ribbon made up of       thousands of threads, with the maximum amount of high-performing carbon and       the minimum (safe) amount of weighty epoxy. The individual threads are woven       together not just at right        angles to the direction of the ribbon's length, but at 45% and 70% decrease       too. It is made to be as strong as it can possibly be.              Third point: the physics of the cable collapse in Red Mars were hyped up for       the Drama. The cable as described is also hideously over engineered (and       possibly goes beyond what can be achieved with carbon - if I remember       correctly the entire cable is        supposed to be a single carbon-diamond molecule shaped in a double helix -       good luck manufacturing that in bulk any time soon).              Point Four: even the serious space elevator fanboys do not expect material       science to catch up with their dreams before the second half of the 21st       century.               Point Five: Any advance in material science that makes a space elevator more       possible is highly likely to make TSTO and SSTO easier. Easier to the point       that the Space elevator might be uneconomical unless we decide to import half       the Oort cloud down it.                      Anyway, take care, have fun, be happy,              Regards       Frank              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca