Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 45,556 of 45,986    |
|    David Ellis to All    |
|    Ship Power from Fusion Rockets?    |
|    21 Jul 18 11:27:20    |
      From: daellis94@gmail.com              So, I have a bit of a dilemma regarding how, exactly, I would want a space       warship of mine to harvest general system power.               My fusion drive rockets would, for fairly obvious reasons, have a considerable       total power for use as an effective torch drive (though, as far as torches go,       this one is probably fairly modest). Now, for reasons that I think are only       mostly rational,        and which I will explain in a moment, I am currently leaning toward using a       pair of fusion spheromaks to provide the ship's general electrical power.        Instead of simply tapping off some of the energy produced by the drive       reactors.               My main reason for this is probably linked, on some level, with the       space-opera-esque assumption that a ship's main reactor(s) isn't also its       propulsion system, but I do have some reason for clinging to this assumption.        First off, I feel like I don't        want to have to rely on my rockets for power in a combat situation or other       scenario in which my power demands are not synonymous with my need to       accelerate. Note that I'm not assuming that the need to accelerate would       imply the need to accelerate at        the maximum rate. Rather, I am thinking that I would very likely need to       provide power at a time when I don't want to be accelerating AT ALL.               This fits into my second reason which is that I would not want to come to a       situation in which I would not want to accelerate needlessly while generating       electrical power, and as far as I can tell, running my fusion drive, even on a       much lower power        setting, would generate thrust, albeit small, from exhaust gases being vented       out of the rear nozzles.               My fusion rockets produce a total thrust power of 4.12 terawatts, which would       come from the charged particle energy of the fusion plasma and as much       Bremsstrahlung X-ray radiation as can be harvested by seeded propellant, with       the power needed to sustain        the reaction being harvested from the fusion, itself, primarily using       onion-like layers of X-ray-absorbent material surrounding each reactor       compartment using X-rays not successfully captured by incoming c       olant/propellant.               The normal reactors I envision are similar, in that they burn the same       helium-3/hydrogen-2 fuel, and produce, I am thinking, a total of 6 gigawatts       of electricity with a total efficiency of around 50% (mostly just to make my       life easier; 6 GW is still        plenty of waste heat to shed, so it's hardly like I'm going easy on myself in       terms of design), which as far as I can tell so far is plenty to supply the       demand of the ship's sensors, life support, thermal control, radar/infrared,       and weapon systems. In        the case of these reactors, helium-4 plasma (the exhaust from H-3/D fusion) is       gradually vented off and stored in tanks on-board the warship, obviously       vigorously cooled so what is stored is simply gaseous helium and not angry,       helium plasma. The        alternative to this, I imagine, would be to simply vent it into space, but I       feel as though I would want to avoid venting high-velocity jets of plasma into       space, mostly because it would help me avoid giving my ship giant, glowing       whiskers (from the        point of view of whoever is looking at me on infrared). Obviously, the same       energy needs to get shed using radiators, but in this instance, I am at least       allowed the option to close up my radiators and rely on internal heat-sinks       instead (only for a        short time, I know). Venting helium into space in all multiple        irections--giving a net zero thrust--doesn't really allow me this       pseudo-stealthy option.               Anyway, to get back on topic, what does everyone else think? Am I insane for       clinging to dedicated fusion reactors that are not the rocket engines?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca