Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 45,574 of 45,986    |
|    0something0 to All    |
|    Extreme Hypersonic Combat Missiles    |
|    10 Sep 18 13:26:35    |
      From: sungjunnoh0802@gmail.com              In a future world where air to air combat aircraft are equipped with nuclear       thermal ramjets or "more conventional" scramjets, they could potentially       outperform modern missiles. Missiles had difficulty intercepting "even" an       SR-71. Current missiles such        as the AIM-120 AMRAAM can achieve only around mach 5. So, we need a way to       drive missiles faster, potentially with two methods:              -Two stage rocket-scramjet missile       A rocket would be used to get a scramjet up to operational speeds where the       missile would fly at close to mach 10. However, the two-staged nature of such       a design would make it larger and more cumbersome, limiting aircraft use and       increase maintenance.        It might work for surface-based systems however.              -Metallic Hydrogen       Instead of using regular solid (or liquid) fuels, the missile would use       metallic hydrogen (assuming it is metastable at normal temps/pressures). Using       pure metallic hydrogen probably will require a magnetic bottle or a massive       cooling system, not very        practical for an aircraft-mounted missile. Using a mixture of something else       for lower temps and more thrust may be beneficial.              What do you guys think?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca