Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 45,577 of 45,986    |
|    els.dallas@gmail.com to wolva...@gmail.com    |
|    Re: James S.A. Corey's answer to There A    |
|    21 Sep 18 19:49:51    |
      On Sunday, September 16, 2018 at 1:15:06 PM UTC-5, wolva...@gmail.com wrote:       > > Today, to public accepts the NSA, spying on every email. The US army is       developing system for total battlefield awareness, along with cruise missiles       and GPS guided bombs, specifically to hit the target. They know that you cant       hit what you cant see.       >        > except the public doesn't accept that, the NSA has yet to successfully carry       through with that, more data creates more questions than answers(and creates       far more probability for error) as anyone with an understanding of military       science knows, and to        quote a sci-fi author who actually understands the hard military science       involved "If you load a mudfoot down with a lot of gadgets that he has to       watch, someone a lot more simply equipped — say with a stone ax — will       sneak up and bash his head in        while he is trying to read a vernier"-Robert Heinlen, Starship troopers.       >        > the thing is when you want to create a realistic science fiction universe       you need to get more than just the physics right, if you don't pay attention       to the military science and the limitations of your analysts, you aren't       writing hard science fiction.        you can't even use handwavium AI for your detection and targeting analysis       without throwing economics out the window.              You don't need to handwave AI for detection and targeting systems. The 340       ton, 200 petaflop Summit computer would be quite capable of performing       detection and targeting, which is just a computer processing issue.               Small spaceships would not have as much computer power or sensor range as a       larger ship. So by limiting ship size, you also limit detection range. If you       posit large ships or a planetary detection grid, then you can also by       extension have to deal with        long detection ranges against even stealth or low observable targets. But       small ships have issues with radiation shielding and artificial gravity. So       there is a question of how "realistic" small manned ships are in the first       place.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca