Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 45,605 of 45,986    |
|    Luke Campbell to David Ellis    |
|    Re: Coil-Gun vs Rail-Gun Projectiles    |
|    07 Dec 18 14:15:14    |
      From: lwcamp@gmail.com              On Friday, December 7, 2018 at 12:07:22 PM UTC-8, David Ellis wrote:              > As far as I know, this behavior would take place regardless of the mass of       this copper alloy segment, with the force exerted depending only on the       current flowing. This isn't the case for a coil-gun, as I understand.        Wouldn't I need to make sure to        incorporate a larger mass of magnetic material in each projectile?               You can build coilguns to work based on induction rather than pushing on a       permanent magnet. Surround the payload with something highly conductive       (copper, say, or graphene or superconductors or whatever your tech assumptions       allow). The fields in the        coilgun barrel induce eddy currents in the conductive sheath which turn the       sheath into an electromagnet for the coilgun fields to push on.               This is the same principle behind modern asynchronous electric motors.        Basically, any coilgun can be considered a rotory motor unrolled into a       straight line, making it a linear electric motor, so the same design       principles apply to both.              As to whether induction is more practical than a permanent magnet, I'll leave       that to the engineers.               >        > Also, each projectile would have electronic guidance components on-board. I       can insulate these from electric current, yes, though possibly with some       difficulty. Would it be feasible to prevent the formation of electromagnetic       fields from damaging the        shell's electronics and sensors?               Wrap the electronics in something highly conductive (like the aforementioned       copper or graphene or superconductors). This will act like a Faraday cage to       protect the electronics from external electric fields. You will need to take       special care wherever        you have wires or cables going outside of the shielded space (such as inputs       from cameras or outputs to guidance rockets or power cords for the computer) -       there are ways to engineer such couplings that limit the amount of external       linkage, but it is        something you need to pay attention to.              Luke              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca