home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.sf.science      Real and speculative aspects of SF scien      45,986 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 45,622 of 45,986   
   Thomas Koenig to winchellchung@gmail.com   
   Re: Potential torch drives   
   28 Dec 18 17:25:55   
   
   From: tkoenig@netcologne.de   
      
   winchellchung@gmail.com  schrieb:   
      
   > People were up in arms about using a nuclear pulse Orion drive   
   > for boosting payload from Earth's surface into orbit. Something   
   > about detonating hundreds of small nuclear bombs in the atmosphere   
   > alarmed them. ;)   
      
   > Zubrin's infamous nuclear salt-water rocket is much worse,   
   > since it is a *continuously detonating* nuclear explosion drive.   
      
   Depends.   
      
   First, I don't hink anybody ever seriously considered using   
   Orion or a nuclear salt-water rocket close to Earth's atmosphere.   
      
   Otherwise, a continuous burn is far less destructive than a   
   sudden one - compare with what happens when a conventional   
   bomb explodes, compared to what happens if a solid rocket   
   booster burns.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca