Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 45,656 of 45,986    |
|    alexandru_trofin@yahoo.com to All    |
|    Re: Community Brainstorming: Damage Cont    |
|    10 Jun 19 05:50:20    |
      David Ellis              "the ship is designed with thick armoring over only a very small number of       mission critical systems"              Even so, the ship would need, at the very least, some sort of external hull to       stop micrometeorite impacts and provide some radiation protection for       sensitive equipment, not to mention a reflective surface to limit solar       heating. The structural supports        for the external hull would be plenty strong enough to hold the pressure hull       together.              "a greater thickness of metal"              The pressure hull wouldn't be made of metal, just fabric with metallic struts       for strengthening. Less like a submarine pressure hull, more similar to an       inflatable space habitat, like the one currently attached to the ISS.              "if weapons fire damages a portion of the ship that would normally be       pressurized"              If enemy fire breaks into the armored citadel and vents it, the ship is       probably already lost. Outside the citadel, repairs would be performed only       after the battle (by definition, nothing outside the citadel is        ombat-critical) and there would be enough        time to seal the leaks, repressurize and then start actual repairs.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca