Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 45,846 of 45,986    |
|    Joel Polowin to Adam Warnock    |
|    Re: Looking for some interesting materia    |
|    08 Jan 21 16:04:04    |
      From: jpolowin@sympatico.ca              On 2021-01-08 9:26 AM, Adam Warnock wrote:       > Y'know, pneumatics/hydralics would would make things simpler than using some       supermaterial. And the point about info-dumping (especially with bad       explanations) is duly noted. I wanted to know so that even if it never came       up, I had a solid foundation        to build details around.              While I'm entirely on board with the principles of "keep it simple" and       "don't over-explain what can better be left as a black box", you might       want to read about magnetorheological fluids. Ordinarily fluid, they       become much more viscous under magnetic fields. They might be useful in       providing some rigidity to the system that you're describing.              I was slightly irritated while overhearing an audio book that my partner       was listening to recently, in that the author kept referring to lights       as "LEDs". The book was set some 300 years in our future. Being       specific about the lighting technology implied that in 300 years,       despite tremendous advancements in other areas, we'd still be using       LEDs. Unless they intended to make a statement about the state of human       technology, the author would have been better off just using "lights" or       "lamps" or some such thing. The details of the lighting tech weren't       relevant to the story itself.              If your radiators were working by conduction or convection -- that is,       by transferring heat to another medium -- you'd want them to have as       much surface area as possible. If they're working strictly by       radiation to space, you want them to have as much unobstructed       line-of-sight exposure as possible. Radiation from one part of the radiator       that hits and is absorbed by another part of the radiator doesn't do       you any good.              Joel              --       This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.       https://www.avg.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca