XPost: rec.arts.comics.marvel.universe, rec.arts.disney.animation,   
   rec.arts.animation   
   XPost: rec.arts.tv   
   From: ted@loft.tnolan.com   
      
   In article ,   
   Paul S Person   wrote:   
   >On Sat, 9 Aug 2025 16:28:23 +1200, Your Name    
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >>On 2025-08-09 01:59:48 +0000, Iéssica said:   
   >>> In article <1074mlj$m6da$3@dont-email.me>, weberm@polaris.net wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The Creator and Producer of X-Men '97, Beau DeMayo, went on something of a   
   >>>>   
   >>>> posting binge on X Saturday, describing in detail the problems he had with   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Marvel executives while trying to do a comic book show that respected fans   
   >>>>   
   >>>> and the source material.  In the process, he revealed some major truths   
   >>>>   
   >>>> about what goes on behind the scenes at Marvel, and it explains a LOT   
   about   
   >>>>   
   >>>> why so many MCU projects go wrong.  This is a MUST SEE folks, and an   
   >>>>   
   >>>> inspiration - clearly Beau DeMayo gets it, and we need more people like   
   him   
   >>>>   
   >>>> in Hollywood! #marvel #mcu #disney   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> https://youtu.be/ijrMi6HhGlU?si=j4HnsJ8x2kWDTcBt   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> We didn't need to be told this. It has been obvious to any comic fan since   
   >>>   
   >>> the middle of Marvel phase 2 (looking at you Age of Ultron and Ironman 3)   
   >>>   
   >>> that they have zero issue deviating wildly from the source material to the   
   >>>   
   >>> detriment of the story and the characters.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>Hollyweird has been doing that for pretty much as long as it has   
   >>existed. The lazy morons making these "adaptations" (as well as   
   >>"reboots" and "resurrections") usually think they know better than the   
   >>person who had the talent to create the thing in the first place as to   
   >>what it "should" have been rather than what it actually *is*. Idiotic   
   >   
   >This doesn't just afflict movies. Disney went through a phase of DVDs   
   >of its animated classics that were "restored to better than their   
   >original brilliance". A fair number of fans (or fanatics) of Disney   
   >animation complained about how they looked.   
   >   
   >I have two CDs purporting to be the same as the original LP Motion   
   >Picture Soundtrack to /Mary Poppins/, both awaiting disposal. I ended   
   >up digitizing the LP because the geniuses-in-charge never bothered to   
   >listen to the LP, they just read the track list. Don't get me wrong:   
   >either CD will do fine for someone who never heard the LP. But they   
   >aren't the same.   
   >   
      
   Of course it's not any better when they do look at the product.   
   For instance the snipping of a smoking scene and the black centauress   
   from the "restored versions" of "Pecos Bill" & "Fantasia" respectively.   
   --   
   columbiaclosings.com   
   What's not in Columbia anymore..   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)