home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.sf.tv      Discussing general television SF      136,466 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 135,045 of 136,466   
   BTR1701 to anim8rfsk@cox.net   
   Re: The holodeck (was Re: What The Hell    
   12 Aug 25 19:39:31   
   
   d7862d91   
   XPost: alt.tv.star-trek, rec.arts.startrek.current, rec.arts.startrek.misc   
   XPost: rec.arts.tv   
   From: atropos@mac.com   
      
   On Aug 12, 2025 at 12:13:13 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk"  wrote:   
      
   > Melissa Hollingsworth  wrote:   
   >>  Verily, in article <165840835.776667635.718336.anim8rfsk-   
   >>  cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this   
   >>  message:   
   >>>   
   >>>  Melissa Hollingsworth  wrote:   
   >>>>  Verily, in article <392916302.776642579.774871.anim8rfsk-   
   >>>>  cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this   
   >>>>  message:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>  Melissa Hollingsworth  wrote:   
   >>>>>>  Verily, in article <635212760.776606512.130859.anim8rfsk-   
   >>>>>>  cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this   
   >>>>>>  message:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>  VOYAGER never did get that right. They had a holo deck where you   
   could live   
   >>>>>>>  indefinitely on imaginary food and drink, and yet they established   
   that it   
   >>>>>>>  went away when you exited. So if you were in the holo deck very long,   
   you   
   >>>>>>>  should just die when you walked outside.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>  So... you could stay in the holodeck for a year and just live on   
   >>>>>>  imaginary food? Did something like this actually happen?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>  Not a year, but probably weeks and certainly several days, long enough   
   that   
   >>>>>  it would kill you.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>  Several days wouldn't kill you. People can live at least a month without   
   >>>>  food, on average. The old rule I recall is "four minutes without air,   
   >>>>  four days without water, forty days without food."   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>  Good point. They presumably aren?t having real water either. They are   
   >>>  living off of imaginary beer and pub food made of hard light.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>  Several weeks might. At the least, you'd show some signs when you came   
   >>>>  out. If not, the holofood must be providing real nourishment.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>  And yet they don?t use it when they?re having problems with the food   
   supply   
   >>>  outside the holo deck   
   >>   
   >>  Maybe it's real food. The holodeck could have food replication ability,   
   >>  but it would need the same supplies as other replicators.   
   >>   
   >   
   > All the food replicators need is power. They don’t rearrange molecules.   
   > They just use power to make something out of nothing.   
   >   
   > However, the food replicators use a different kind of power than anything   
   > else uses. The holodecks run on a different kind of power than the food   
   > replicators do. They can’t make real food.   
   >   
   > I’m not sure how many different kinds of power Voyager requires, but they   
   > very definitely established that food replicator power is different than   
   > anything else on the ship.   
      
   Food replicator power is artificial. The rest of the ship runs on natural   
   power.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca