Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.tv    |    Discussing general television SF    |    136,466 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 135,084 of 136,466    |
|    solar penguin to All    |
|    Re: [NEWS] Still no release date for "Th    |
|    19 Aug 25 05:41:35    |
      XPost: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.tv       From: solar.penguin@gmail.com              The True loon was lost as usual:              > On 18/08/2025 18:16, solar imbecile wrote:       >>       >> The True Doctor wrote:       >>       >>> On 18/08/2025 14:53, solar idiot wrote:       >>>>       >>>> The True Doctor wrote:       >>>>       >>>>>       >>>>> Why would anyone want to watch a show fronted by a character who       >>>>> behaves like an incompetent, self centred, misandristic, man       >>>>> hating bitch, surrounded by a bunch of homosexuals and       >>>>> other DEI hires?       >>>>>       >>>>       >>>> Simple. It’s because they don’t agree with that interpretation       >>>> of the characters. I’m surprised you needed to ask.       >>>       >>> It isn't an interpretation. It's a fact which emerges from the script       >>> because that is how the character is written. She release a monster       >>> inside UNIT HQ which could have killed everyone so that she could       >>> sexually harass, demean, and insult Conrad because he was a man when she       >>> could have just ordered the security guards there to shoot him on the       >>> spot the moment the lift doors opened.       >>>       >>       >> Again, not everyone shares that interpretation.       >>       >       > It isn't an interpretation.              And you accused me of not paying attention in English lessons!?!              > It's an absolute fact. The sexist bigot set       > a monster loose upon UNIT and the whole world and then tried to blame       > Conrad with putting the world in danger, when it was she who had put the       > world in danger because of her hatred of men.              Even if that were true, it would just mean that your interpretation       was the same as the author’s, that you interpreted it in the intended       way. But that’s still interpretation. Interpreting something right       is still interpreting it. The author’s intended interpretation is still an       interpretation.              (And you’ve no evidence that this was the author’s intended       interpretation anyway.)              --       solar penguin              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca