XPost: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.tv   
   From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca   
      
   In article <10812qf$3igjm$1@dont-email.me>,   
   solar penguin   wrote:   
   >   
   >The True loon was lost as usual:   
   >   
   >> On 18/08/2025 18:16, solar imbecile wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> The True Doctor wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 18/08/2025 14:53, solar idiot wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The True Doctor wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Why would anyone want to watch a show fronted by a character who   
   >>>>>> behaves like an incompetent, self centred, misandristic, man   
   >>>>>> hating bitch, surrounded by a bunch of homosexuals and   
   >>>>>> other DEI hires?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Simple. It’s because they don’t agree with that interpretation   
   >>>>> of the characters. I’m surprised you needed to ask.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It isn't an interpretation. It's a fact which emerges from the script   
   >>>> because that is how the character is written. She release a monster   
   >>>> inside UNIT HQ which could have killed everyone so that she could   
   >>>> sexually harass, demean, and insult Conrad because he was a man when she   
   >>>> could have just ordered the security guards there to shoot him on the   
   >>>> spot the moment the lift doors opened.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Again, not everyone shares that interpretation.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> It isn't an interpretation.   
   >   
   >And you accused me of not paying attention in English lessons!?!   
   >   
   >> It's an absolute fact. The sexist bigot set   
   >> a monster loose upon UNIT and the whole world and then tried to blame   
   >> Conrad with putting the world in danger, when it was she who had put the   
   >> world in danger because of her hatred of men.   
   >   
   >Even if that were true, it would just mean that your interpretation   
   >was the same as the author’s, that you interpreted it in the intended   
   >way. But that’s still interpretation. Interpreting something right   
   >is still interpreting it. The author’s intended interpretation is still an   
   >interpretation.   
   >   
   >(And you’ve no evidence that this was the author’s intended   
   >interpretation anyway.)   
   >   
      
   Yes Melissa, radw on a good day.   
      
   >--   
   >solar penguin   
      
      
   --   
   Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca   
   Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!   
   Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;   
   All I want to hear from JEsus Christ is WEll done Good and Faithful servant   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)