[continued from previous message]   
      
   >>>> Fans are torn: some find it a creepy and memorable horror outing,   
   >>>> while others criticize the dream sequences and lack of narrative   
   >>>> finesse.   
   >>>> ([Jammer's Reviews][4], [IMDb][6], [Late to the Game Blog][5])   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ---   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ## Final Rating: **7 / 10**   
   >>>>   
   >>>> **Verdict:** *Night Terrors* is a bold, atmospheric experiment for   
   >>>> *TNG*, doubling down on sleeper horror within a Star Trek context. Its   
   >>>> strengths lie in unsettling visuals and psychological dread   
   ¢â‚¬â€�uncommon   
   >>>> for the series. However, the undercooked dream imagery and narrative   
   >>>> thinness dilute its effectiveness. At its best, it's a creepy   
   >>>> standout; at its weakest, it’s a drawn-out oddity.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Interesting, using a llm to review a 30+ year old episode, an era where   
   >>> shows weren't serialized like they are today.   
   >>>   
   >>> how do you develop lore for a 40 minute episode?   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> See “Dataloreâ€�   
   >   
   > What about it?   
   >   
      
   They developed lore in a 46 minute episode   
      
   --   
   The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)