XPost: rec.arts.startrek.current, alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise, rec.arts.tv
From: dannyb@panix.com
In <109q4cj$17vnq$1@dont-email.me> Your Name writes:
>On 2025-09-09 15:10:04 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>> Ubiquitous wrote:
>>> Star Trek Enterprise, originally just called Enterprise, had a slow start,
>>> but eventually it hit its stride with a really dramatic and wellput
together
>>> third season
>>
>> Not in this or any adjacent alternate reality
>Yep. "Enterprise" was a failed reboot attempt, with the usual silly
>changes and the idiotic over-sexed "oil me up, Scotty" decontamination
>scenes to pull in the 13 year old perverts. Complete drivel from start
>to finish. :-\
[snip]
I've previously posted something similar to the following:
I watched the first episode because, well, first. Not
interested.
Every so often I'd be channel surfing when it was on. Watched
it for a few minutes, then bye bye.
At the end of its run they announced the last four episodes
would be repeats of the best as chosen by You, The Viewers.
I figured that would be worth a try.
One of them was actually good. The Enterprise headed
to a Vulcan Religious Retreat planet, bumped into some
Andorans who had taken over and were claiming it was
actually a giant Vulcan spy base.
The budget cuts hurt... but the plot worked.
Another one was decent but I don't recall the details.
I turned off the other two after a couple of minutes...
--
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
dannyb@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
