XPost: rec.arts.drwho, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho   
   From: blueshirt@indigo.news   
      
   The Doctor wrote:   
      
   > In article ,   
   > Blueshirt  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > The True Melissa wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> In article <10d8i9v$3ujh$1@dont-email.me>,   
   > >> agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM says...   
   > >> >   
   > >> > The Timeless Child monster cannot be ignored as it changes   
   > >> > the Doctor's entire origin story and turns him into an   
   > >> > entirely different character which is that of an   
   > >> > unrepentant war criminal hiding from their crimes.   
   > >>   
   > >> That's exactly why it should be ignored.   
   > >   
   > > Doesn't matter... they'd still find something else to moan   
   > > about if the "Timeless Child" was retconned...   
   >   
   > What exactly?   
      
   Some people do nothing BUT moan about the show.   
      
   Nobody could like EVERYTHING about a television show that's   
   run for 60+ years, so clearly people are happy to ignore some   
   bits of it when it suits them. But, then when a female Doctor,   
   oops I mean the Timeless Child storyline, came along, they get   
   their knickers in a twist and start frothing at the mouth.   
      
   The world hasn't ended. Calm down and JUST IGNORE IT!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)