XPost: rec.arts.tv   
   From: ahk@chinet.com   
      
   s|b  wrote:   
   >On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 15:18:27 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
      
   >>So, yeah, in the case of grooming, a child could very much be influenced   
   >>to have a homosexual sexual encounter with an adult that he wouldn't   
   >>have had without the power imbalance. Whether that turns him homosexual   
   >>for the rest of his life seems unlikely. But who knows.   
      
   >And yet, that is exactly what the guy is stating.   
      
   s|b is playing selective quoting games. I never took the click bait. My   
   reaction was to YOUR comments only, which I still disagree with,   
   especially your denial of grooming.   
      
   	The YT troglodyte talks about 'grooming' someone to become   
   	gay. People don't 'become' gay; they're born this way.   
      
   You have denied influence upon sexuality and falsely claimed that it's   
   entirely organic. Obviously it's a mixture of both. Everything human is.   
      
   >But hey, if it can make you feel better:   
      
   >"Yes, Adam, you're right. As usual. I forgot for a moment you're   
   >omniscient."   
      
   >(kill filing this thread)   
      
   How sad. Here's what you should have learned on Usenet on Day 1: You   
   drop out of a thread by shutting the fuck up, by not referring to it,   
   and certainly, by not posting a followup announcing your dropping out   
   and kill filing.   
      
   That just makes you a drama queen and an object of derision.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)