XPost: alt.tv.stargate-sg1, rec.arts.tv   
   From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   On 2025-11-21 13:36:04 +0000, Blueshirt said:   
   > Your Name wrote:   
   >> On 2025-11-20 13:17:44 +0000, s|b said:   
   >>>   
   >>> Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without being creative).   
   >>   
   >> George Lucas was creative ... it's Disney that lazily remade the   
   >> original movies (with Politically Correct changes)   
   >   
   > Well, Lucas messed around quite a bit with the original movies long   
   > before Disney took over the franchise. Some of his 'edits' were not   
   > very creative or popular. He was constantly tinkering with those first   
   > three movies... like a small boy that has just discovered his willy and   
   > can't stop touching it!   
      
   Yes, but the point is Geroge Lucas had the creativity to make the   
   movies and (at least from a maker's stance) every right to alter tham   
   to his satisfaction. Disney on the other hand showed zero creative   
   ability in the "Sequel Trilogy", although some of the TV shows and   
   other spin-off movies have been better.   
      
      
      
   >> and stupidly called them a "Sequel Trilogy",   
   >   
   > "Sequel Trilogy" was being used in fandom long before Disney came   
   > along. So Disney did not coin that term. (I don't know who did though.)   
      
   Disney simply took the original movies and lazily rehashed them with   
   extra Politically Correct nonsense. They laughingly called them a   
   "Sequel Trilogy", when in reality they were just lazy remakes.   
      
   George Lucas was already working on his own Sequel Trilogy when he sold   
   out to Disney. His version was a bit better, although reportedly   
   brought back Darth Maul, which is a silly idea, but later re-used for   
   the animated series.   
      
      
      
   >> plus of course Disney's continual laziness in doing 'live-action'   
   >> remakes of all their animated movies.   
   >   
   > Guilty!   
   >   
   > Although for 'live action' read CGI animated... i.e. there were no real   
   > Lions in "The Lion King" remake (etc.)   
      
   Depends on which remade movie it is. Some are pure CGI and some are CGI   
   / live-action mix. There may even be a couple that are all live-action,   
   but I've never bothered to watch any of them to know for sure.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)