Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.tv    |    Discussing general television SF    |    136,466 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 135,698 of 136,466    |
|    Daniel70 to Your Name    |
|    Re: [HeelvsBabyface] Doctor Who is OVER     |
|    23 Nov 25 20:47:57    |
      XPost: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.tv       From: daniel47@nomail.afraid.org              On 23/11/2025 8:50 am, Your Name wrote:       > On 2025-11-22 11:28:38 +0000, Blueshirt said:       >> Your Name wrote:       >>> On 2025-11-20 15:26:10 +0000, RICHARD perin said:       >>>> In article       >>>> <6c9fdff618ba6b2cf876190900442a26@hamiltonhall.info>,       >>>> john@hamiltonhall.info wrote:       >>>>>       >>>>> I'm glad its dead, much better than seeing it violated       >>>>> time and time again.       >>>>       >>>> Like Star Trek.       >>>       >>> And Batman.       >>> And Superman.       >>> And Knight Rider.       >>> And Battlestar Galatica.       >>> And ...       >>>       >>> Now there's a new Stargate show been announced, so there       >>> goes another franchise down the toilet. :-(       >>       >> Is it the franchises changing for the worse... or just us getting       >> older and not liking change?! ;-)       >       > For me it's definitely all the idiotic changes that simply make the "new       > version" a very different show, so why did they bother re-using the same       > title? They may as well just have made a completely new show to begin       > with (e.g. "Warship Gigantica") and say it is very loosely based on the       > original.       >       > Almost always these silly remakes / reboots / reimaginings are done by       > some new egotistical fool who thinks they know better then the person       > with the talent to come up with the original, as to how it "should have       > been done".              Hmmm!! (As this IS a 'Doctor who' newsgroup I'm reading this in ....)       I'm thinking you were thinking about Chris Chibnall there, Your Name!!              > There's usually some nonsense excuse that re-using the same name means       > they have a "built-in audience", but that's utter rubbish - the changes       > mean the original fans won't like it, and people who didn't like the       > original are unlikely to watch something with the same name.       >       > Even resurrected shows (including prequels, sequels, and spin-offs) with       > mostly the same cast and crew rarely work because everyone has changed       > and time has moved on, so it's never really the same "magic" as it was       > the first time around.       >       --       Daniel70              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca