home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.sf.tv      Discussing general television SF      136,466 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 135,865 of 136,466   
   The True Melissa to All   
   Re: Would "Time Baronet" be lower rank t   
   11 Dec 25 06:55:02   
   
   XPost: rec.arts.drwho   
   From: thetruemelissa@gmail.com   
      
   In article <10hcov9$53f$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>,   
   doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca says...   
   >   
   > In article ,   
   > The True Melissa   wrote:   
   > >In article <10hc5qi$i9g$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>,   
   > >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca says...   
   > >>   
   > >> In article ,   
   > >> The True Melissa   wrote:   
   > >> >In article <10ha0ti$12voq$1@dont-email.me>,   
   > >> >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM says...   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> On 09/12/2025 03:15, Nomen Nescio wrote:   
   > >> >> > or any less pompous than the High Council?   
   > >> >> >   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> Would Time Earl be a higher rank than Time Lord? Time King anyone? Time   
   > >> >> Peasant? Time Serf? Time Villain (as in villager)?   
   > >> >   
   > >> >I could see a Time King popping up as a villain.   
   > >> >   
   > >>   
   > >> Lik Rassilon?   
   > >   
   > >I'd rather see an original villain. Besides, in my head   
   > >canon, the current Rassilon is merely named after the   
   > >founder, not literally him.   
   > >   
   >   
   > Do you recall what they did to Rassilon under 12?   
      
   No. Did they kick him out at some point?   
      
   New Rassilon was still in charge when the Doctor   
   confronted him in "Hell Bent."   
      
      
   Melissa   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca