XPost: rec.arts.drwho
From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
In article <10mqth3$3hgik$11@dont-email.me>,
Lawrence D˙Oliveiro wrote:
>On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 14:39:26 -0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
>
>> I would take physical over digital.
>
>If there is an analog format worth resurrecting, it’s tape.
>
>Vinyl remains stuck in the 1970s, but the humble cassette tape
>continued evolving long after that, with things like chromiun and
>barium oxides, metal particles, new kinds of Dolby noise reduction,
>and what-all.
>
>Speaking of noise reduction, remember that vinyl has this convoluted
>thing called the “RIAA equalization curve”. Back in the day, you had
>ceramic versus magnetic pickups, and one of them had to compensate for
>the curve, but the other did not (I forget which was which). How could
>you be sure either way that you were compensating for the curve
>exactly? You didn’t.
Tape vs Digital Versatile Data format. What will not deteriorate?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
All I want to hear from Jesus is WEll Done Good and Faithful Servant.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
