Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.movies.past-films    |    Past movies    |    192,336 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 190,383 of 192,336    |
|    gggg gggg to cri...@windstream.net    |
|    Re: 'The Magnificent Ambersons' (1942)    |
|    05 Mar 21 22:09:20    |
      5fa22ec4       From: ggggg9271@gmail.com              On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 6:17:49 PM UTC-7, cri...@windstream.net       wrote:       > So why was the young George made up like a       > girl, long curly locks, skirt, and all? Anything goes       > nowadays, but in 1942 that must have been quite       > shocking to audiences, and I fail to see a good reason for       > it. It's true that George was a 'mama's boy' in the sense       > of being overly devoted to his mother in later life, but       > as a child he was a rich-kid spoiled brat, for which       > being made up like a girl seemed pointless.       >       > Not that it matters much, though. The main problem       > with the movie was the very end, not the beginning.       > As an Orson Welles virtuoso showpiece, the movie       > was quite impressive, and all the way to George's       > final, somber 'comeuppance', it was not unconvincing,       > with the high point being Eugene's letter to Isabel, and       > the choice she made. But the very last scene, in the       > hospital, came across as an unconvincing feel-good       > artificial resolution. I wonder if the Tarkington book       > ended the same way.              I think it did.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca