Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.movies.past-films    |    Past movies    |    192,336 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 190,621 of 192,336    |
|    Mark Leeper to All    |
|    Review: MIDWAY (2019)    |
|    02 Jul 21 06:53:48    |
      From: mleeper@optonline.net              MIDWAY (2019) (film review by Mark R. Leeper and Evelyn C. Leeper)              This is a 2019 re-creation of the Battle of Midway, currently best       known from the 1976 film MIDWAY. The special effects seem a grade       below those of Michael Bey's 2001 PEARL HARBOR, and the script       drops a lot of names to tie this film to that one. In fact, the       first half of this film is about the attack on Pearl Harbor and the       subsequent Doolittle raid on Tokyo. It is an hour into the film       before Midway is more than just a passing name.              But the name-dropping is also because, unlike the earlier 1976 film       MIDWAY, or PEARL HARBOR (which also covers the Doolittle Raid),       this film does not add fictional characters or a fictional love       interest. (Another film set in this period that sticks to real       people is TORA! TORA! TORA!) So all the names are real and hence       sound a little like name-dropping. Even when names aren't       mentioned, there are glimpses of the best-known people from Pearl       Harbor. For example, at the awards ceremony shown about an hour in       (and which took place shortly before the Battle of Midway on the       deck of an aircraft carrier), we see from behind an African-       American seaman in the row of recipients; that would be Doris       Miller, who was awarded the Navy Cross on May 27 on the deck of the       USS Enterprise.              (Many films have featured highly fictionalized accounts of the       attack on Pearl Harbor, the Doolittle Raid, or both. This may be       the first reasonably accurate depiction of those events.)              One problem in war movies is balancing the chaos of battle with the       need to let the audience follow what is going on. MIDWAY leans       more toward the former than the latter.              Another problem with the film is that it may be too accurate. We       are introduced to a lot of actors with unfamiliar faces who are       much less familiar than those in, say, the earlier MIDWAY, making       it harder to keep the characters straight. This makes it harder to       follow the events.              The script also takes the story from 1937 to 1942, chops it in       pieces, and although it shows them in chronological order, the       script jumps a few months or years with only minimal warning.              Mark summarizes: "I never actually followed a historic battle for       accuracy. This one I did. The Battle of Midway is one of the most              amazing stories in military history and I was very pleased to see a       new film featuring that story."              This is the rare war film that gets more points for historic       accuracy than for entertainment.              Rating: low +3 (-4 to +4)              --       Mark R. Leeper and Evelyn C. Leeper              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca