Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.movies.past-films    |    Past movies    |    192,336 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 192,029 of 192,336    |
|    gggg gggg to All    |
|    Re: Armageddon question    |
|    04 Jul 23 09:04:28    |
      From: ggggg9271@gmail.com              On Sunday, March 23, 2003 at 8:15:13 PM UTC-8, Mpoconnor7 wrote:       > I was watching the end of this movie on FX today, and have a question. If the       > nuclear device was broken and Bruce Willis had to sacrifice himself and stay       > behind on the asteroid to set it off, how comes the Astronauts were debating       > whether to set it off from onboard the Shuttle after they took off? Couldn't       > they have just left the thing there and set it off once they were away?       > Michael O'Connor - Modern Renaissance Man       > "The probability of one person being right increases in a direct porportion       to       > the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong"              https://www.salon.com/2023/07/04/armageddon-is-25-years-old-scie       tists-agree-this-problematic-blockbuster-aged-like-warm-milk/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca