Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.movies.past-films    |    Past movies    |    192,336 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 192,073 of 192,336    |
|    Lenona to Lenona    |
|    Re: "Make Shakespeare Dirty Again" - and    |
|    22 Aug 23 09:35:14    |
      From: lenona321@yahoo.com              On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 12:00:35 PM UTC-4, Lenona wrote:       > This guest essay was in the NY Times.        >        > OK, so this isn't about the movie versions. But still...                Actually, this WAS included:              ...Where the avant-garde led, pop culture followed. Shakespeare’s plays have       always lent themselves to all manner of interpretations and they found new       life in the postwar era, with landmark works like Basil Dearden’s “All       Night Long,” a neo-noir        film from 1962, which set “Othello” in a British jazz soiree. Franco       Zeffirelli’s “Romeo and Juliet” in 1968 plugged into a different       cultural zeitgeist, capturing onscreen the summer of love, while Roman       Polanski’s film version of “Macbeth        in 1971 feels like an encomium for the dying utopian dreams of the ’60s.              In the transgressive ’90s, Shakespeare was everywhere: taboo, art house,       alternative and cool. Gus Van Sant’s “My Own Private Idaho” reimagined       Prince Hal and Hotspur as gay grunge gods and Baz Luhrmann’s “Romeo +       Juliet” featured Leonardo        DiCaprio at the peak of his androgyne allure. Even “Shakespeare in Love,”       a relatively middlebrow Oscar winner, presented a vision of the brooding,       bearded, sexy Shakespeare, as embodied by Joseph Fiennes...              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca