Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.composition    |    The writing and publishing of speculativ    |    144,800 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 142,839 of 144,800    |
|    John W Kennedy to Jymesion    |
|    Re: Simulating SF Scenario    |
|    03 May 14 09:45:01    |
      From: jwkenne@attglobal.net              On 2014-05-02 08:04:33 +0000, Jymesion said:              > One scenario I keep returning to involves a Chronoscope. (One of the       > reasons I can't let it go is because it seems to be full of       > possibilities, but I've never found a decent story to write involving       > one.) I long ago concluded that it'd be incredibly boring punctuated       > with moments of intense excitement.       >       > Imagine it -- you've invented a device that let's you look back in       > time.       >       > And then imagine what you'd do with it.       >       > Great historical finds! Yeah, except no one would believe you unless       > you revealed the details of its construction so other people could       > verify that it's real and it works as you claim.       >       > Once others know how to build one, what do they need you for? You'd       > become nothing but a footnote, just like the people who develeped the       > Xerox machine and the transistor.       >       > I, at least, would use it first to gain wealth. Lost treasures come to       > mind first.       >       > Tracking something would entail going from the earliest known record       > of it, you have to backtrack to who told the person who wrote it down,       > who told them, who told them, etc., and then when you've found the       > person who actually saw it, you'd have to track them back to that       > point in their life. Even if your device allows you to speed up the       > passage of time that you're watching, you can only go so fast if you       > have to maneuver to keep a person within your screen, and you'd have       > to slow down to listen every time they have a conversation which might       > be about what you're looking for.       >       >       > The whole point to this is I realized today that there's something       > that, in a way, simulates that. Geoguesser.com is a Google 'game'       > which shows you a random place on Earth, and you have to guess where       > it is. By following the road, you eventually reach a town where there       > are signs.       >       > But it can be agonizingly slow -- I had a few minutes to kill during a       > download. Each click advanced me no more than a couple of hundred       > feet. I'd only gone, at most, a couple of miles before my download was       > complete. I guessed at random and found it was a road through a       > national forest. There's no way of knowing how much longer it would       > have taken for me to get somewhere recognizable.       >       > It's an odd thing for me to find anything that simulates one of my SF       > scenarios.              Didn't Asimov shoot the Chronoscope plot in the head decades ago?              --       John W Kennedy       Having switched to a Mac in disgust at Microsoft's combination of       incompetence and criminality.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca