Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.composition    |    The writing and publishing of speculativ    |    144,800 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 143,150 of 144,800    |
|    J.Pascal to David Friedman    |
|    Re: One Wish...    |
|    17 Jun 14 09:27:24    |
      From: julie@pascal.org              On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 2:21:26 AM UTC-6, David Friedman wrote:       > On 6/16/14, 4:46 AM, Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) wrote:       >        > > Yes. But the employee contribution is usually VASTLY larger than they       >        > > are paid.       >        >        >        > If that were typically the case, wouldn't you expect wages and salaries        >        > to make up only a small fraction of national income relative to profits?        >        > You can look up the numbers pretty easily.       >               No, because there are more categories than salaries and profits. An employee       can bring in a great deal more than they're paid without the excess going to       profit. There's the employer cost of benefits (though that maybe ought to       count as wages, to be        fair) and overhead and expenses and reinvestment and taxes and bunches of       stuff I'm using the wrong names for.              -Julie              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca