Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.composition    |    The writing and publishing of speculativ    |    144,800 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 143,195 of 144,800    |
|    J.Pascal to Shawn Wilson    |
|    Re: World building help    |
|    28 Jun 14 13:42:36    |
      From: julie@pascal.org              On Saturday, June 28, 2014 12:22:55 PM UTC-6, Shawn Wilson wrote:       > On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 10:30:43 PM UTC-7, J.Pascal wrote:       >        > > But I'm realizing... why *wouldn't* they have a couple big cities?        >        > Cites serve an economic end that defines their location and size. If the       economic situation doesn't call for/support a large city, one won't exist.        >        >        > Here, what is basically going on is mining. For tech/information rather       than gold, but the same forces apply. A local pharma industry is       unrealistic. Those will always be high civilization adjacent. Agriculture       for specific components and        preliminary processing of those components is perfectly fine.              The pharma industry is based on the unique local biology. Fungus, plants,       tiger gallbladders... it's the only real export the planet has other than       working holidays for archaeologists. There will be on-site labs and a certain       amount of economic        speculation related to figuring out if the slime on a particular toad is good       for anything. The city supports the port so it will have all of the normal       things that are required day-to-day such as a construction industry, food       production and processing,        hospitals, transportation, and at least one repair yard for orbital shuttles.        Port City is what it is, a transplanted center of commerce and population.               On the other side of the world from where my story is set.               >        > So, you have an amount of economic activity on the planet. Obviously it       must be scattered. There aren't large unified deposits of [economia] to       exploit, so no large cities to exploit them. QED. Think the 19th century       American frontier. If the        inhabitants wanted large cities they would have stayed back east. St Louis to       San Francisco that was jack-all for large cities.              And jack-all for population. And it lasted all of 30 years, less than a full       generation.                      >        > What else? The low tech is obviously domestic, the high tech imported.        They may have maker machines (*we* have those, forget 3d printing, an       automated milling machine can make damn near anything) to make one off items       of high tech on an as needed        basis.        >        >        >        > As I see it, and I am an economist, I don't think your situation requires       justification. It's fine.              Well, if no one is going to question it, then I suppose that's the definition       of "not a problem".              It's still not stopping the author from having an issue with having plopped       down a small colony in the temperate zone of a planet and then having it stay       that way for several centuries.              -Julie              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca