From: julie@pascal.org   
      
   On Monday, July 28, 2014 1:19:50 PM UTC-6, Shawn Wilson wrote:   
   > On Monday, July 28, 2014 11:32:16 AM UTC-7, Michelle Bottorff wrote:   
   >    
   >    
   >    
   >    
   >    
   > > I think that space marines would lean more to the current Air Force   
   >    
   > >    
   >    
   > > attitude than the current Marine attitude, and high physical strength   
   >    
   > >    
   >    
   > > would be a lower priority.   "Fit geeks" is the ideal I've been aiming   
   >    
   > >    
   >    
   > > for.    
   >    
   >    
   >    
   >    
   >    
   > Thing is, powered armor is fine, so long as you HAVE power.  What do you do   
   when it runs out?  Soldiers can never be *guaranteed* a functioning logistics   
   tail.   
      
   If you're in space and the power runs out, you're dead.   
      
   IRL, the loss of technological support is a real problem... but it doesn't   
   actually mean that making everyone learn how to do their military tasks   
   "analog" is a reasonable solution.  Granted, there is a real good reason that   
   any talk about making    
   military weapons "safe" by adding a technological "authorized user"   
   kill-switch gives operators the hives. "But your enemy can't pick up your gun   
   and shoot you," isn't persuasive.   
      
   But we already, now, depend so heavily on technology that a "loss of power"   
   would be devastating.  But the benefits and increased functionality outweigh   
   the risk.   
      
   There is no reason to think that a military with power-suit commandos wouldn't   
   put small people in those suits.   
      
   -Julie   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)