Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.composition    |    The writing and publishing of speculativ    |    144,800 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 143,272 of 144,800    |
|    Will in New Haven to J.Pascal    |
|    Re: Plausible Characters?    |
|    29 Jul 14 09:28:56    |
      From: willreich_77@yahoo.com              On Monday, July 28, 2014 6:17:54 PM UTC-4, J.Pascal wrote:       > On Monday, July 28, 2014 1:19:50 PM UTC-6, Shawn Wilson wrote:       >        > > On Monday, July 28, 2014 11:32:16 AM UTC-7, Michelle Bottorff wrote:       >        > >        >        > >        >        > >        >        > >        >        > >        >        > > > I think that space marines would lean more to the current Air Force       >        > >        >        > > >        >        > >        >        > > > attitude than the current Marine attitude, and high physical strength       >        > >        >        > > >        >        > >        >        > > > would be a lower priority. "Fit geeks" is the ideal I've been aiming       >        > >        >        > > >        >        > >        >        > > > for.        >        > >        >        > >        >        > >        >        > >        >        > >        >        > > Thing is, powered armor is fine, so long as you HAVE power. What do you       do when it runs out? Soldiers can never be *guaranteed* a functioning       logistics tail.       >        >        >        > If you're in space and the power runs out, you're dead.       >        >        >        > IRL, the loss of technological support is a real problem... but it doesn't       actually mean that making everyone learn how to do their military tasks       "analog" is a reasonable solution. Granted, there is a real good reason that       any talk about making        military weapons "safe" by adding a technological "authorized user"       kill-switch gives operators the hives. "But your enemy can't pick up your gun       and shoot you," isn't persuasive.       >        >        >        > But we already, now, depend so heavily on technology that a "loss of power"       would be devastating. But the benefits and increased functionality outweigh       the risk.       >        >        >        > There is no reason to think that a military with power-suit commandos       wouldn't put small people in those suits.              No reason but the very common SF writer/reader conviction that action scenes       require that people throw hands. Being adept at hand-to-hand combat hasn't       been a war-winning issue for a very long time but people like to read/write       about it.              --        Will in New Haven              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca