Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.composition    |    The writing and publishing of speculativ    |    144,800 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 143,277 of 144,800    |
|    Shawn Wilson to Will in New Haven    |
|    Re: Plausible Characters?    |
|    30 Jul 14 10:05:28    |
      From: ikonoqlast@gmail.com              On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 6:27:07 AM UTC-7, Will in New Haven wrote:                     > > > Women tank crews or mixed tank crews would be hugely advantageous.        >        > >        >        > >        >        > >        >        > > Nope, which is why no one does it. Tankers actually need physical       strength women don't possess for their various duties. Setting up camo       netting, fixing tracks, and just loading the gun all require significant upper       body strength. France limited        tank crews to 5'4'' and less, but never used women.        >        >        >        > I bet I've spent more hours in an M60 than you have,                     I was an 11B10, my hours in an M60, or any related vehicle even approximately       bulletproof, is zero.                                    > And the reason no one does it is because no one has done it.                     Or because people AREN'T STUPID. People HAVE tried women in combat, it went       badly. Not just for them , but for the people around them.               --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca