Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.composition    |    The writing and publishing of speculativ    |    144,800 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 143,453 of 144,800    |
|    Nicky to Jacey Bedford    |
|    Re: Question - Page Proofs    |
|    01 Sep 14 05:31:18    |
      From: nicky.matthews@btinternet.com              On Monday, September 1, 2014 1:02:05 PM UTC+1, Jacey Bedford wrote:       > For the traditionally published authors here. Some advice required.       >        >        >        > On average, how long does it take you to deal with the page proofs?       >        >        >        > Have you usually had the opportunity to go through the copy edits before        >        > the page proof stage?       >        Yes. I don't know how usual that is though. I worked with the same copyeditor       on a number of books by which time we'd trained each other up pretty well.       She'd say ' I know you are going to want to keep this but I just want to point       out...'       and then I'd say - 'No that was actually a mistake - so glad you found it...'       We shared a lot of chocolate and coffee to get there though and it usually       took a full day sitting together and working through it. However, I do make an       enormous number of        mistakes unlike many of my published friends who never make any errors of       punctuation or typing.        >        > This time round, for reasons of speed (due to a delay at the publisher's        >        > end with edits) I ended up having to do the copy edit check and the page        >        > proof (galley) check in one pass. I only had three days to page proof a        >        > 171,000 word (532 page) novel. I did it, but only by hitting my desk as        >        > I rolled out of bed in the morning and staying there until I fell asleep        >        > over my keyboard at night.       >        >        >        > The copy edit picked up mainly punctuation, but also Americanised my        >        > British English, so I acquired a few gottens and a lot of -ize endings        >        > as well as discovering that there is no word in the USA equivalent to        >        > the British 'boffin'. (We ended up with 'scientist' but that really        >        > doesn't cover it.)       >        >        >        > Anyhow, I thought I'd ask how this tallies with your experience. I do        >        > feel as though the check was rushed and worry that I could have done it        >        > better given more time. What's your experience?              I think Bloomsbury are unusually thorough - each manuscript went through desk       editor, copy editor, proof editor and me - so a different individual was       checking at every stage. I also checked bound proofs. Mistakes still got       through!        I hate edits so I would hit them intensively over a couple of days and       actually had a good reputation for getting things done fast. I think they were       asking rather a lot of you as your book is way longer than any of mine.       >        > Luckily it still goes through a final proof-read at the publisher's end.              That's always good - though beware sometimes they add a whole new set of cock       ups. In one book of mine the printer misread the editor's mark up and inserted       a highly mangled paragraph - twice! Sometimes its a 'Cat in the Hat' situation       where every clean        up produces a new error!              Congratulations for getting it turned round so fast! It is worth rushing so       that you don't miss your publishing slot. DAW probably have a faster turn       round time than Bloomsbury anyway when commission to publication is around two       years.              Nicky              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca