Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.composition    |    The writing and publishing of speculativ    |    144,800 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 143,461 of 144,800    |
|    John W Kennedy to William Vetter    |
|    Re: Question - Page Proofs    |
|    01 Sep 14 17:24:24    |
      From: jwkenne@attglobal.net              On 2014-09-01 21:09:59 +0000, William Vetter said:              > On Monday, September 1, 2014 3:09:50 PM UTC-4, J.Pascal wrote:       >> On Monday, September 1, 2014 6:02:05 AM UTC-6, Jacey Bedford wrote:       >>       >> (...)       >>       >>> The copy edit picked up mainly punctuation, but also Americanised my       >>       >>>       >>       >>> British English, so I acquired a few gottens and a lot of -ize endings       >>       >>>       >>       >>> as well as discovering that there is no word in the USA equivalent to       >>       >>>       >>       >>> the British 'boffin'. (We ended up with 'scientist' but that really       >>       >>>       >>       >>> doesn't cover it.)       >>       >>       >>       >> *Sigh* That's because in the US we say "boffin".       >>       >       > You mean in the sense that shag is used in UK?              In contemporary use, I believe "shag" is an affectation on both sides.              --       John W Kennedy       "Never try to take over the international economy based on a radical       feminist agenda if you're not sure your leader isn't a transvestite."        -- David Misch: "She-Spies", "While You Were Out"              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca