From: nicky.matthews@btinternet.com   
      
   On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 9:06:15 AM UTC+1, Chris Dolley wrote:   
   > >"Nicky" a �crit dans le message de    
   >    
   > >news:dbf8c817-e6c6-46b5-acb0-868e0a27df7e@googlegroups.com...   
   >    
   > >I've been sent a contract for my kid's horror story. There's no advance and    
   >    
   > >the terms are not particularly great. The company is not well known, the    
   >    
   > >jackets are terrible and i >am wondering if it might not be better to self    
   >    
   > >pub or try to pub through some kind of author's collective for kid's stuff.   
   >    
   >    
   >    
   > >I was going to self pub it because it isn't the kind of thing my agent reps    
   >    
   > >and then, when I realised how time consuming it would be to self pub, I    
   >    
   > >sent it out to a few >independents.   
   >    
   > >The least attractive of them got back first and positively.   
   >    
   >    
   >    
   > >I probably should have thought this through because I can't delay for long    
   >    
   > >and I don't have time to send it to a better house. Obviously I am an    
   >    
   > >idiot, but what do you think - is >any publisher better than none?   
   >    
   >    
   >    
   > Any publisher is definitely not better than none. An incompetent publisher    
   >    
   > can damage your reputation in many ways and, to the average reader, any    
   >    
   > mistake they find in the book is your fault not the publishers. So... crap    
   >    
   > covers, poor formatting, typos, pricing too high, distribution cock-ups -    
   >    
   > the ways a bad publisher can harm you are legion. And then you have the    
   >    
   > potential nightmare of the bankruptcy debacle - if your publisher goes    
   >    
   > bankrupt your book could become tied up as an asset for years as creditors    
   >    
   > and the courts argue over what to do with it. Was it Nightshade that    
   >    
   > recently collapsed? Whoever it was, I know the resulting uncertainty left a    
   >    
   > lot of authors severely stressed.   
   >    
   Thanks for that, Chris.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|