Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.composition    |    The writing and publishing of speculativ    |    144,800 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 143,578 of 144,800    |
|    Nicky to Michelle    |
|    Re: Do you revise old work or start some    |
|    14 Sep 14 06:33:36    |
      From: nicky.matthews@btinternet.com              > Nicky wrote:               > > I am comfortable with pseudonyms! None of them are like the work I've sold       >        > > so there's no point in using my usual name.       >        Michelle wrote       >        > I'm not sure that is true.              > If you self-publish under a name that you have published under       >        > traditionally the books will be taken more seriously than if you       >        > self-publish under a name that has only been self-published under.              > The thing is, see, that ANYBODY can self-publish, including people who       >        > really can't write.               >        > If the buyer knows that you've sold traditionally, they will feel more       >        > confident about your writing ability, and it will be easier for them to       >        > decide to take the gamble.       >        This is true and why I'm probably going to join a group of UK children's       writers known as Author's Electric. There are some great writers there and       they are all trad published as well.        However there are a number of reasons why I don't want to use the N M Browne       name.        I have written as Nicola Matthews for younger children - so long ago that all       of the titles are out of print and I think I'd prefer to build on that.        >        > On average, self-published authors do way worse than traditionally       >        > published authors.       >        >        >        > BUT "Hybrid" authors, that's authors who do both, tend to do very well       >        > indeed, better even than the traditionally published ones.       >        Yes. I think that is probably true but as you have found in self publishing it       is confusing for readers if you write very different stuff under the same       name. The book I am considering is more like the material I used to write       years ago than my most        recent stuff.       You have got me thinking though and as I don't really want to write anything       like it again, self pubbing may not be a good route as not only will I not       get any readership from an existing fan base but I won't be building a new       fan base either. It will        just sink into a very large pit without trace.              > Only... I don't think "I never really liked this story and I'm just       >        > trying to get it out of my drawer" is the best attitude to go into       >        > self-publishing with, even as a hybrid author.        >        And I think you've nailed it there. This is a one off story. I don't want to       write a sequel and I'm not very interested in writing anything else for the       same age group or in the same style. I am unlikely to put in the work       necessary to sell it. I have        been offered a contract for it. I probably should just accept that deal and       forget about it. Thanks!              Nicky       >               --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca