Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.composition    |    The writing and publishing of speculativ    |    144,800 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 143,628 of 144,800    |
|    William Vetter to Kevin C    |
|    Re: How do you revise?    |
|    22 Sep 14 18:45:39    |
      From: mdhangton@gmail.com              On Monday, September 22, 2014 7:39:04 PM UTC-4, Kevin C wrote:       > On Sunday, September 21, 2014 7:21:59 AM UTC-4, William Vetter wrote:       >        > > All of what you describe here are English Composition issues. None of       them are Not For Us story issues that are matters of opinion whether they are       bad writing.       >        > We have to take care of these issues to even get to this last point. To       which there's no real way to tell except read some issues first, see if your       story fits with what they're buying, and give it a try. IIRC, in a book on       writing, Ben Bova said that        he ever made a sale to a publisher who printed stories that he didn't like, so       perhaps that's a good test.       >        Let us say a ms. is submitted for critique or beta reading or whatever you       want to call it. One response is              "In one part of the manuscript you have spelled 'moonrock' as one word, and in       another part you have spelled 'moon rock' as two words. You should pick one       way and be consistent."              Another is              "You are a bigot. No cosmonaut will ever drink a shot of engine coolant       before he flies."              The first is an indisputable aspect of English Composition. You can learn it,       put the issue behind you and then say "I have made my writing better." As for       the second, maybe the next person who reads it will tell you that it makes the       story authentic        and is characterization. It is a matter of opinion. The next guy who reads       it might reject you for taking that out.              >        > > I don't understand how correcting typos and grammar can cut word count in       half.       >        >        >        > That was going through the three manuscripts and taking care of typos and       grammar. The other revisions trimmed it down further.              I still don't get it. I mean, I always spell abscissa and harass and occur       with the wrong number of c s and r's, but that's not ever going to change word       count by more than 5%. Are you writing 200 word sentences with lots of       semicolons and then cutting        away whole clauses?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca