Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.composition    |    The writing and publishing of speculativ    |    144,800 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 143,692 of 144,800    |
|    J.Pascal to William Vetter    |
|    Re: weather    |
|    05 Oct 14 12:18:45    |
      From: julie@pascal.org              On Friday, October 3, 2014 5:07:32 PM UTC-6, William Vetter wrote:       > In one of those books written by somebody who has claimed to have rejected       50,000 manuscripts or something, that's supposed to list everything we're       doing wrong, I found one of them that was interesting to me. This person       claimed that it is almost        universal to use weather as a metaphor for the mood of the fiction, and       authors describe the weather progressive scenes as an obligation, and this is       sooooo cliched, and a grounds for rejection.                     Well... anything done *badly*...              If someone is writing by numbers, "And now I will set the scene with weather       that predicts the outcome of the next encounter..." Or if the writing is       pretentious "mood masturbation" it might be rejected, but I would think that       would lead to descriptions        of more than the weather such as peeling paint or extreme detail about what       the fly is doing walking across the cupcake or what not. (Sorry, I really       couldn't think of a more accurate term for what I mean).               > I don't know that this is so, but I do see this sort of thing a lot, as in       detective fiction where the weather is always dismal. Or historical fiction       where the city is always wet and stinking and beset by a miasma.       >        > How and when do you describe weather or what do you think about it.              I think that scene setting and "mood" setting are entirely legitimate, even       required. I say this having forced myself to at least skim to the end of a       story that had nothing. Sure, characters told each other stuff or thought       stuff "The sun had been        shining the day he first met her"... which of course is guilty of "sun" equals       how he felt about meeting her that day... but you never knew if it was day or       night or what season it was even after someone told someone else that it was       January you        immediately forgot because no one actually traveled through the house or       countryside... which brings me to my other point... (My first being that not       *having* any description tucked between is Really Bad.)              What does your character notice? If he's cheerful he might notice cheerful       things, even in the midst of wet, stinking, miasma. Someone brooding over       injustice might notice some little offense in the middle of a joyful       celebration.              All things are tools and it's stupid not to use them or to be convinced you       ought not use them because someone else used them badly.              Saying "You can't use weather to indicate mood" is like saying "no more using       short words and sentences to heighten a sense of urgency."                     -Julie              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca