home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.sf.composition      The writing and publishing of speculativ      144,800 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 143,699 of 144,800   
   John W Kennedy to Jacey Bedford   
   Re: What is in a name?   
   06 Oct 14 00:10:25   
   
   From: jwkenne@attglobal.net   
      
   On 2014-10-05 20:46:43 +0000, Jacey Bedford said:   
      
   > On 05/10/2014 13:32, William Vetter wrote:   
   >> On Sunday, October 5, 2014 7:52:51 AM UTC-4, Jacey Bedford wrote:   
   >>> On 30/09/2014 15:27, John W Kennedy wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2014-09-30 02:11:52 +0000, Michelle Bottorff said:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>> A. Tina Hall  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>>> (Now imagine not being able to use pay, buy, trade, deal,... because   
   >>>   
   >>>>>> they don't have any economy based on trades.)   
   >>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>> Sounds rough.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>> Racciman's World is hard enough with a "don't use" list that includes:   
   >>>   
   >>>>> year, month, week, hour, minute, second, mile, ghost, and cat.  There   
   >>>   
   >>>>> may be more that I've forgotten.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>> Yours is definately worse.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>>> I also wonder about the use of the word switch, what root there is,   
   >>>   
   >>>>>> because I only know electric switches (when not thinking "whips"), and   
   >>>   
   >>>>>> want to use the word in the sense of switching objects, positions,   
   >>>   
   >>>>>> whatever.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>> Shakespeare uses "switch" as in whip, but not, apparently in the sense   
   >>>   
   >>>>> you want.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>> I don't know where that usage came in -- If I had to guess, I think I'd   
   >>>   
   >>>>> go with Victorian.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>> But I confess, it never would have occurred to me to avoid it on grounds   
   >>>   
   >>>>> of it being too recent.   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> Electric switches are named after railway switches. (British English   
   >>>   
   >>>> commonly uses "point", instead, but "switch" seems to be the earlier   
   >>>   
   >>>> term.) One would suppose the bending, tapered rails used in a railway   
   >>>   
   >>>> switch were being compared to a rider's switch.   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Yes we use the word points in Britain, perhaps because the change of   
   >>>   
   >>> position points the train in another direction. I'm guessing.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> In both cases the use of the word 'switch' meaning to change seems like   
   >>>   
   >>> the obvious one to me, however. A rider's 'switch' has no meaning in   
   >>>   
   >>> British English and I can't see the link between it and railway lines.   
   >>>   
   >>> Do you mean the stick a rider carries? That's a crop in British English   
   >>>   
   >>> (or a whip depending on the actual implement, but crop is most common).   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> An electric swtich switches or changes the current. Seems obvious.   
   >>>   
   >> The electric switch came after development of railroads, I think.   
   >>   
   >> I will tell you what I think the ultimate origin is, based on looking   
   >> this up in various places.   
   >> 1) switch was first a stick involved in horsemanship.   
   >> 2) the railroad switches were originally operated manually, by a lever   
   >> that was about as long as a switch or riding crop, so they came to be   
   >> called switches in US.   
   >> 3) electrical switches were named after the railroad switch, on account   
   >> of analogous function.   
   >> #2 is the murkiest of word origins of the three.  I am not an expert,   
   >> but this seems the most logical, after looking through what I have   
   >> around.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   > You're ignoring the obvious that to switch means to change.   
      
   It didn't.   
      
   --   
   John W Kennedy   
   "The bright critics assembled in this volume will doubtless show, in   
   their sophisticated and ingenious new ways, that, just as /Pooh/ is   
   suffused with humanism, our humanism itself, at this late date, has   
   become full of /Pooh./"   
     -- Frederick Crews.  "Postmodern Pooh", Preface   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca