From: seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com   
      
   On 12/3/14, 10:56 PM, David Goldfarb wrote:   
   > In article <1lw3cky.15t99h21n5gewwN%mbottorff@lshelby.com>,   
   > Michelle Bottorff  wrote:   
   >> I think my preference for Shakespeare is to   
   >> read it first and then see it.   
   >   
   > An approach I've seen suggested, and which has worked well for me   
   > when I've employed it, is to read act I beforehand to get an introduction,   
   > then see the performance, then to read the rest afterward to fill in   
   > anything that you might have missed.   
   >   
      
   	The few times I've watched Shakespeare on the stage do not appear to   
   have given me anything extra to make up for the time and/or money spent   
   on them. Movies are different, because they have camera work, clear   
   lighting and sound, and so on. Of course, my favorite remains Arnold   
   Schwarzenegger's Hamlet.   
      
   --   
                         Sea Wasp   
                           /^\   
                           ;;;	   
   Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com  Blog:   
   http://seawasp.livejournal.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)