XPost: rec.arts.drwho, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv   
   XPost: rec.arts.tv, can.arts.sf   
   From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca   
      
   In article ,   
   The Last Doctor   wrote:   
   >No Yads got ChatGPT to think for him:   
      
   IYIO!   
      
   >>”   
   >>   
   >> In 1989, after 26 years of thrilling audiences with its time-traveling   
   >> adventures and captivating storytelling,   
   >   
   >Hyperbole. Wherever ChatGPT picked up its Doctor Who knowledge it was   
   >clearly from extreme fanbois: I loved the show and it was usually   
   >entertaining, but rarely thrilling and only occasionally captivating, even   
   >at the best of times. Which were over by 1980 …   
   >   
      
   I guess CHATGPT does not view MM as intellignet!   
      
   >>Doctor Who faced an untimely   
   >> cancellation.   
   >   
   >Assuming a conclusion. At this point the computer has not established a   
   >case that the cancellation was “untimely”. (It was, but in the sense that   
   >it was LATE.)   
   >   
      
   Wrongo, bongo!   
      
   >> The decision to end the series left fans devastated and marked   
   >> the end of an era in television history.   
   >   
   >There weren’t many fans left to BE devastated. That was rather the point.   
   >It did mark the end of an era. Mainly with an huge sigh of relief that the   
   >poor, overworked, ailing, ageing pet had been mercifully put to sleep.   
   >   
      
   Excuse us, but what abou those writing letters to the BBC to bring DW back!   
      
   >> This article explores the reasons why   
   >> Doctor Who should have never been cancelled in 1989, delving into its   
   cultural   
   >> significance, its enduring legacy,   
   >   
   >Lots of things that come to an end had cultural significance and an   
   >enduring legacy. That doesn’t mean that they remained current and relevant.   
   >   
      
   So where do you hide?   
      
   >> and the missed opportunities   
   >> that arose from its premature demise.   
   >   
   >Premature assumed again - essay needs to present evidence and it doesn’t.   
   >   
      
   Wrongo yet again!   
      
   >> Cultural Phenomenon:   
   >>   
   >> Doctor Who transcended the confines of television to become a cultural   
   >> phenomenon beloved by fans around the world. Since its inception in 1963,   
   the   
   >> series captured the imagination of viewers with its imaginative narratives,   
   >> iconic characters, and groundbreaking special effects. Doctor Who became   
   more   
   >> than just a TV show; it was a shared experience that brought people together   
   >> across generations and continents.   
   >   
   >Yes it was a lovely thing. But the pitiful remains of that thing were   
   >largely regarded with sadness or disdain in 1989.   
      
   Only by those who have no appreciation.   
      
   >   
   >>   
   >> The cancellation of Doctor Who in 1989 deprived fans of a beloved   
   institution   
   >> and left a void in popular culture.   
   >   
   >Hardly. Fan made continuations in various media began almost immediately   
   >and carry on to this day. Cancelling the show didn’t cancel fandom,   
   >imagination or continuation by other means - from the New Adventures novels   
   >to the BBV Stranger, PROBE and Downtime videos, the third Doctor audios   
   >Paradise of Death and Ghosts of N- Space, the regrettable EastEnders   
   >charity crossover - this “void” must be the least voidy void ever   
   imagined.   
      
   You forget 1996 as well.   
      
   >   
   >> The absence of new episodes meant the end   
   >> of an era for millions of viewers who had grown up with the Doctor's   
   >> adventures. Furthermore, the cancellation prevented the series from reaching   
   >> new audiences and engaging with a new generation of fans.   
   >   
   >Self evident, but the show as it was was leaking fans. Not gaining new   
   >ones.   
   >   
      
   In North America , it was gaining not leakng!   
      
   >>   
   >> Enduring Legacy:   
   >>   
   >> Despite its cancellation, Doctor Who's legacy endured long after its final   
   >> episode aired. The series continued to inspire countless spin-offs, novels,   
   >> audio dramas, and comic books, keeping the spirit of the show alive for   
   years   
   >> to come. The dedicated fanbase, known affectionately as Whovians, remained   
   >> devoted to the series, organizing conventions, fan clubs, and online   
   >> communities to celebrate their love for the Doctor and their companions.   
   >>   
   >> The cancellation of Doctor Who in 1989 only served to strengthen the   
   >dedication   
   >> of its fanbase and cement its status as a cultural icon. The show's   
   influence   
   >> extended beyond television to influence other works of science fiction and   
   >> fantasy, inspiring countless creators and artists to explore the boundless   
   >> possibilities of time and space.   
   >   
   >These paragraphs indicate how strong the Whoniverse became after   
   >cancellation of the show - so certainly don’t show that the cancellation   
   >was a bad thing! Who was livelier and fresher in the 90s than it had been   
   >in the 80s.   
      
      
   After That had left, the inept Mjor could have been a fun target for satire!   
      
   >   
   >   
   >>   
   >> Missed Opportunities:   
   >>   
   >> The cancellation of Doctor Who in 1989 represented a missed   
   >opportunity for the   
   >> series to evolve and grow in new directions.   
   >   
   >The text is now contradicting itself, as it has just shown (as I had   
   >earlier) that the series continued to   
   >“evolve and grow in new directions” BECAUSE of the cancellation. Sounds   
   >like opportunities seized, not missed.   
   >   
      
   Same difference.   
      
      
   >> With advances in technology and   
   >> storytelling techniques, Doctor Who had the potential to reach new heights   
   of   
   >> creativity and innovation.   
   >   
   >It only had to improve to “poor” (as it did in season 26) to reach new   
   >heights of creativity and innovation compared with previous seasons. It   
   >wasn’t enough.   
   >   
      
   Yet Grade Powell did say scifi had not palce in the BBC. Major Clue!   
      
   >   
   >>The cancellation prevented the series from exploring   
   >> new story arcs, introducing new characters,   
   >> and pushing the boundaries of the sci-fi genre.   
   >   
   >No, it did all those things. Just not on TV for a while.   
   >   
      
   And in the 1990s?   
      
   >>   
   >> Furthermore, the cancellation deprived fans of closure for ongoing   
   storylines   
   >> and character arcs. The Seventh Doctor, portrayed by Sylvester McCoy,   
   >was left   
   >> without a proper send-off, and many questions remained unanswered. The   
   >> cancellation left fans with a sense of unfinished business and a longing for   
   >> resolution that would not be realised for many years.   
   >   
   >The rest of the text just repeats the same points over and over, after   
   >digressing into the revival which, given that it was 15 years after the   
   >cancellation, is hardly relevant to the cancellation itself.   
   >   
   >> … it ultimately paved the way for the series' triumphant return   
   >> and ensured that the Doctor's adventures would continue to inspire   
   >> and captivate audiences for generations to come.   
   >   
   >So no harm, no foul. In the long run. And that breathing space was   
   >necessary - it’s exceedingly unlikely that the modern show would have   
   >arisen out of more McCoy and whatever horrors John Nathan-Turner might have   
   >inflicted on us next.   
   >   
      
   I rather that than the alternative.   
      
   >--   
   >“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor   
      
      
   --   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)