XPost: rec.arts.drwho, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv
XPost: rec.arts.tv
From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
In article ,
Arthur Lipscomb wrote:
>On 4/9/2024 7:28 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article ,
>> John Hall wrote:
>>> In message , Arthur Lipscomb
>>> writes
>>>> On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article ,
>>>>> Your Name wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>> 1960s?
>>>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>>>> 1990s?
>>>>>>> 2000s?
>>>>>>> 2010s?
>>>>>>> 2020s?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised movie with
>>>>>> Paul McGann in 1996.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show started in
2005.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>
>>> I didn't like it myself. The worst thing was possibly its take on the
>>> Master, who I have always felt should be outwardly charming rather than
>>> hideous.
>>
>> What about the Daleks exterminating the MAster?
>>
>>> --
>>
>
>I have to admit, the Daleks would never put someone on trial. They
>exterminate first and ask questions later! But it would have been a
>*little* more believable if the Master convinced the Daleks to let him
>git rid of the Doctor for them and it was all part of a joint plan. A
>throw away line could have fixed that plot hole. Perhaps that was the
>plan all along but the scene was cut for time.
Exactly! A trial for the Master by the Daleks?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
