XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.drwho   
   From: blueshirt@indigo.news   
      
   The Doctor wrote:   
      
   > In article ,   
   > Blueshirt  wrote:   
   > > The Doctor wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> > anim8rfsk   wrote:   
   > >> >   
   > >> > I’d give it an eight except for the ending which I’d give   
   > >> > a zero.   
   > >>   
   > >> 0 !!   
   > >>   
   > >> average still below 5   
   > >   
   > > Actually 'anim8rfsk' said that he'd give the ending zero...   
   > > but eight for the rest of it.   
   > >   
   > > I'm sure if we were rating Doctor Who episodes on their   
   > > ending alone, "73 Yards" wouldn't have got above an average   
   > > of 1!   
   >   
   > Still   
   >   
   > IMDB 8.4/10 from 3000+ participants.   
      
   One of your favourite rating sites isn't following the narrative   
   I see.   
      
   > We must be quite the harsh critics.   
      
   Who's the 'we'? You are the one that submits algorithm reviews,   
   and AI generated posts!   
      
   The rest of us review and rate episodes from our own   
   perspectives.   
      
   > I predict a growing sour taste.   
      
   The 8.4/10 average rating on IMDB doesn't seem to represent much   
   of a sour taste... I've even seen some people online give "73   
   Yards" a 10/10 rating, which seems overly generous, but each to   
   their own and all that...   
      
   This season would want to start delivering something a bit more   
   than it has done though. I've watched all four episodes twice   
   and they are not going to be on my re-watch list any time soon.   
   There's no real substance to any of these episodes so far.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)