XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.drwho   
   From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca   
      
   In article ,   
   Daniel70 wrote:   
   >Blueshirt wrote on 29/05/2024 4:28 am:   
   >> The Doctor wrote:   
   >>> In article , Blueshirt   
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>> The Doctor wrote:   
   >>>>>> anim8rfsk wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I’d give it an eight except for the ending which I’d give a   
   >>>>>> zero.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> 0 !!   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> average still below 5   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Actually 'anim8rfsk' said that he'd give the ending zero... but   
   >>>> eight for the rest of it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I'm sure if we were rating Doctor Who episodes on their ending   
   >>>> alone, "73 Yards" wouldn't have got above an average of 1!   
   >>>   
   >>> Still   
   >>>   
   >>> IMDB 8.4/10 from 3000+ participants.   
   >>   
   >> One of your favourite rating sites isn't following the narrative I   
   >> see.   
   >>   
   >>> We must be quite the harsh critics.   
   >>   
   >> Who's the 'we'? You are the one that submits algorithm reviews, and   
   >> AI generated posts!   
   >>   
   >> The rest of us review and rate episodes from our own perspectives.   
   >>   
   >>> I predict a growing sour taste.   
   >>   
   >> The 8.4/10 average rating on IMDB doesn't seem to represent much of a   
   >> sour taste...   
   >   
   >... but, you watch, when that 8.4/10 slips to below 8 or, maybe, below 7   
   >even, the Iam an Idlehands' paedophile mouthpiece named Dan of Aus could   
   (rightly??) claim his 'prediction' was correct.   
   >   
   >Small mercies!   
      
   Oh?   
      
   >--   
   >Daniel   
      
      
   --   
   Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca   
   Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!   
   Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;   
   United Kingdom save the NAtion on 4 July 2024 vote Liberal Democrat   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|