55a9cd9d   
   XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.drwho, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho   
   XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, can.arts.sf   
   From: weberm@polaris.net   
      
   anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote:   
   >Ubiquitous  wrote:   
   >> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:   
   >>> Ubiquitous   wrote:   
   >>>> In article , mike@xenocyte.com wrote:   
   >>>>> anim8rfsk  wrote:   
   >>>>>> Arthur Lipscomb  wrote:   
      
   >>>>>>> 5 out of 10 seems a bit low for an episode you seemed to like.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I'd give it an eight except for the ending which I’d give a zero.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> On another review thread I posted:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> This could have been a wonderful mystical story. It was well acted and   
   >>>>> directed and held the attention from beginning to end - but the story is   
   >>>>> just complete bollocks. I don't know how to rate it - going to have to   
   >>>>> split the difference between its dramatic quality (8/10) and its plot   
   >>>>> value (0/10) and give it 4   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If you watch it a second time (horrors!), both scores will be lower   
   >>>> because youy'll catch all the stupid things you missed the first time.   
   >>>   
   >>> I try to be generous!   
   >>>   
   >>> Gatwa is 2 steps better than Whittaker.   
   >>   
   >> That's very generous! LOL!   
   >   
   >Not really. Whittaker is by far the worst Doctor ever with Crapaldi (when   
   >he's not being saved by the impossibly cute Clara) a close second.   
      
   It's almost as if some idiot thought "Hey! I bet we'd get more women viewers   
   if we made the main char female!".   
      
   --   
   Let's go Brandon!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)