3a86778a   
   From: petertrei@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/24/2024 10:20 AM, Michael Benveniste wrote:   
   > On 11/21/2024 9:47 AM, Evelyn C. Leeper wrote:   
   >   
   >  > And, in an extra detail that the internet is devouring, the term of the   
   >  > agreement was set using the "Rule Against Perpetuities" — which states   
   >  > that a policy will continue until after a certain person dies.   
   >  >   
   >  > In this case, the declaration will continue "until twenty one (21) years   
   >  > after the death of the last survivor of the descendants of King Charles   
   >  > III." DeSantis, after all, frequently refers to Walt Disney World as a   
   >  > "corporate kingdom."   
   >   
   > Under case law, that clause would be invalid, since the descendants   
   > would have had to been "objectively identifiable" at the time of grant.   
   > But who knows how the Florida Supreme Court will rule?   
      
   IIRC, the clause actually specifies the 'descendants of King Charles   
   the III at the time the contract is executed'.   
      
   Barring illegitimate offspring, that's pretty objective.   
      
   pt   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)