XPost: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv   
   From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca   
      
   In article ,   
   Blueshirt  wrote:   
   >The Doctor wrote:   
   >   
   >> In article ,   
   >> Your Name   wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> > A complete NON-surprise that the ratings are lower than the   
   >> > pre-Disney seasons. Disney of course bought into Doctor Who   
   >> > because they stupidly believed it would raise their number   
   >> > of subscribers, which it wasn't ever going to do and anybody   
   >> > with more than one braincell could have told them the   
   >> > 'ratings' would drop dramatically. The only legal way for   
   >> > international viewers to watch "Doctor Who" currently is to   
   >> > subscribe to Disney+, which most people simply weren't going   
   >> > to bother doing, especially for just one show and continual   
   >> > prices rises (both for Disney+ and general retail prices for   
   >> > everything).   
   >> >   
   >> > Subscription-based streaming services themselves weren't   
   >> > really a good idea to begin with, let alone numerous   
   >> > services all with their own 'exclusive' content. The old   
   >> > cable and satelitte TV services have been struggling for   
   >> > decades to retain and grow subscriber numbers.   
   >>   
   >> So Disney+ is not as popular as hoped.   
   >   
   >Or more accurately...   
   >   
   >Doctor Who is not as popular as Disney hoped!   
      
   Draw not popular.   
   --   
   Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca   
   Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!   
   Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;   
   Ontario vote for the Liberals - The best Anti-Trump option!   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)