Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.fandom    |    Discussions of SF fan activities    |    137,311 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 136,488 of 137,311    |
|    Blueshirt to Your Name    |
|    Re: [Overlord DVD] Disney Ready to Dump     |
|    08 Feb 25 16:30:55    |
      XPost: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv       From: blueshirt@indigo.news              Your Name wrote:       >       > A complete NON-surprise that the ratings are lower than the       > pre-Disney seasons. Disney of course bought into Doctor Who       > because they stupidly believed it would raise their number of       > subscribers, which it wasn't ever going to do and anybody with       > more than one braincell could have told them the 'ratings'       > would drop dramatically. The only legal way for international       > viewers to watch "Doctor Who" currently is to subscribe to       > Disney+, which most people simply weren't going to bother       > doing, especially for just one show and continual prices rises       > (both for Disney+ and general retail prices for everything).              I don't think the directors of these streaming services live in       the real world. I would never have thought anyone around the       world would subscribe to Disney+ JUST for "Doctor Who"... it's       not that kind of essential show. Maybe when the Tenth Doctor and       Rose/Martha were around it might have happened to some degree,       as that was a popular time for the show. But Disney were being       delusional if they thought in 2023 that "Doctor Who" would be       the show to hook the masses in to their shiny new streaming       service.              Now, I did think "Doctor Who" post 2023 would be more popular       than it has been... but even as a fan, and had I needed to, I       still wouldn't have subscribed to Disney+ just to watch "Doctor       Who" at the prices they are charging.              > Subscription-based streaming services themselves weren't       > really a good idea to begin with, let alone numerous services       > all with their own 'exclusive' content. The old cable and       > satelitte TV services have been struggling for decades to       > retain and grow subscriber numbers.              There is a use for streaming services but I doubt anyone       subscribes to any of them for just one show. When they were a       bit cheaper, and during covid, they played their part in       entertaining us, but now with the continual price rises, and       adverts, people will be more choosy in which ones they       subscribe to. So whenever I see reports that subscriber numbers       are down on ______ service I just think, "What did you expect?"              Nobody can subscribe to everything so somebody is going to       suffer.              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca