Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.fandom    |    Discussions of SF fan activities    |    137,311 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 136,726 of 137,311    |
|    Evelyn C. Leeper to All    |
|    MT VOID, 07/11/25 -- Vol. 44, No. 2, Who    |
|    13 Jul 25 08:54:25    |
      [continued from previous message]              reality, they would display regression toward the mean of the       population on the ship, which would probably be a bit north of       150. In other words, they wouldn’t lose the intellectual advantage       they started with.              For a real world example, the unusually high mean IQ of Ashkenazi       Jews (about 115) has been maintained for many generations, to the       best of my knowledge.              The idea that children brought up on a generation ship would       resent it as imprisonment seems to fly in the face of common       sense. Instead, as other SF writers have suggested, the real       problem would be to get the space-born to abandon the only world       they've ever known, when they've reached their destination and       they're supposed to colonize an unfamiliar and dangerous planetary       surface.              In response to Evelyn's comments on DEVIL'S CONTRACT in the       07/04/25 issue of the MT VOID, Taras writes:              Your description of the sloppy editing in DEVIL'S CONTRACT by Ed       Simon made me wonder if was published by a vanity press.              Treating the Nazi takeover of Germany as a “Faustian bargain” is a       stretch. It’s only in retrospect that Adolf Hitler seems satanic.       To most people at the time, he was just the same old same old,       cynically exploiting Jew hatred to gain power. Nobody thought he       would do what he did: his antisemitic policy was not just evil,       it was idiotic. Any Communist dictator could have told him, first       win your war, then exterminate whomever you please.              Evelyn responds:              DEVIL'S CONTRACT was published by Melville Press, an independent       press which probably has minimal staff. It is not a vanity press       so far as I can tell; according to Wikipedia, "In 2007, they were       named by the Association of American Publishers as the winner of       the 2007 Miriam Bass Award for Creativity in Independent       Publishing." [-ecl]              ===================================================================              TOPIC: BACK TO THE FUTURE (letter of comment by Gary McGath)              In response to Mark's review of BACK TO THE FUTURE in the 07/04/25       issue of the MT VOID, Gary McGath writes:              [Mark wrote,] "The cast is made up almost exclusively of unknowns.       The minor exceptions are Lloyd, whose face is familiar from ONE       FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST--he played a belligerent inmate--and       from TO BE OR NOT TO BE." [-mrl]              Lloyd was most familiar to me as Kruge in STAR TREK III. [-gmg]              And John Kerr-Mudd writes:              He was a taxi driver for the Sunshine Cab Company; Danny Devito       was the dispatcher [in the television series TAXI]. [-jkm]              Evelyn adds:              Both of these appeared before BACK TO THE FUTURE, so they do       count. [-ecl]              ===================================================================              TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)              THE WARS OF THE ROSES: THE FALL OF THE PLANTAGENETS AND THE RISE       OF THE TUDORS by Dan Jones (Viking, ISBN 978-0-670-02667)       continues English history from his earlier book, THE PLANTAGENETS.              Alas, I have to note that Viking still lacks a copy editor: "he       was decidedly the least impressive of his three elder brothers"       implies he was one of his three elder brothers. While the       Plantagenets did have a very complicated family tree, I don't       think any of them were one of his own elder brothers.              Jones writes, "... they were outnumbered by three to one." No,       "by" is a preposition that needs an object. Either "they were       outnumbered by Henry's men, three to one" or "they were       outnumbered, three to one" would be correct.              "Edward IV had been the most capable politician and talented       soldier to wear the English crown since Henry V." Given that there       was only one king between them (Henry VI), that is like saying       "Thomas Jefferson was the only President elected to a second term       since George Washington."              And let's face it, the Wars of the Roses are hard enough to follow       as it is. No matter how straightforwardly an author writes--and       Jones is on the whole pretty straightforward--that period of       English history is just going to be a muddle. [-ecl]                     ===================================================================               Evelyn C. Leeper        evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com                      My goal in life is to become as wonderful as my dog        thinks I am.        --Toby & Eileen Green              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca