Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.fandom    |    Discussions of SF fan activities    |    137,311 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 136,848 of 137,311    |
|    Evelyn C. Leeper to All    |
|    MT VOID, 08/29/25 -- Vol. 44, No. 9, Who    |
|    31 Aug 25 06:04:30    |
      [continued from previous message]              him" or "'twas Beauty killed the Beast." -ecl]              ===================================================================              TOPIC: SPACE SHIPS! RAY GUNS! MARTIAN OCTOPODS! INTERVIEWS WITH       SCIENCE FICTION LEGENDS, compiled and edited by Richard Wolinsky       (copyright 2025, Tachyon Publications, $17.95, 246pp, trade       paperback, ISBN 978-1-61696-442-9) (book review by Joe Karpierz)              The older I get, the more I want to look back. I don't know if       that's because there's more to look back on (by definition), or       because I have some sort of sense of nostalgia, or because I'm       curious about various historical events. Or, as in the case of the       history of science fiction and its fandom, I just want to learn       about something. As I wrote in my review of Alec Nevala-Lee's       ASTOUNDING JOHN W. CAMPBELL, ISAAC ASIMOV, ROBERT A. HEINLEIN, L.       RON HUBBARD, AND THE GOLDEN AGE OF SCIENCE FICTION (that title is       such a mouthful that I almost forgot what I was going to write       next), "I'd also been developing a curiosity about the history of       the field...". I wrote that statement back in November of 2018,       and to this day I continue to be interested in the history of the       field. It's gotten to the point where I'm more likely to pick up       some historical non-fiction work about the field than I am a       novel, collection, or anthology. Thus, when I spotted SPACE SHIPS!       RAY GUNS! MARTIAN OCTOPODS! INTERVIEWS WITH SCIENCE FICTION       LEGENDS, I requested and was fortunate enough to receive an eARC       of the book.              In February of 1977 at KPFA-FM in Berkeley, a new radio program       called "Probabilities (initially "Probabilities Unlimited")"       debuted. On that program, for something in the neighborhood of 20       years (give or take), Richard Wolinsky, Richard A. Lupoff, and       Lawrence Davidson interviewed dozens of science fiction writers,       editors, and publishers, covering the time period from the pulp       magazines all the way up to 1990s. The subjects of those       interviews were wide ranging, from fellow authors and editors, to       the magazines, the publishing business, and much more. The list of       interviewees contains names that I was familiar with, such as Jack       Williamson, Anne McCaffrey, Frank M. Robinson, Forrest       J. Ackerman, A. E. Van Vogt, and Isaac Asimov to names that I'd       never heard of before, such as Charles D. Hornig, Harry Bates,       Doc Lowndes, Ray Palmer, and more.              The subjects were wide and varied. The interviews covered the       pulps magazines, the digest magazines, the slick magazines, and       more. The Cast of the Book (as the interviewees were called)       talked about Hugo Gernsback and AMAZING STORIES, John W. Campbell       and ASTOUNDING (later ANALOG, which is still being published       today), ARGOSY, FANTASY (Campbell's fantasy magazine) and many       more: THE MAGAZINE OF FANTASY AND SCIENCE FICTION (still being       published today), WORLDS BEYOND, IF: THE WORLDS OF SCIENCE       FICTION, OTHER WORLDS, UNIVERSE, ROCKET STORIES, and so many more.       Paperback publishers are also talked about here: Bantam,       Ballantine, Ace Books, Avon Books, and more.              There was dirt--oh boy, there was dirt--about Gernsback,       Campbell, and a host of other editors and publishers who wouldn't       pay their authors. There is much made these days about Hugo       Gernsback being cheap and not paying, but there were so many       others it seems like it's impossible to count them all. One story       was recounted of an editor who was chased through the streets of       New York City in an effort to get the checks he owed to the       authors he published.              And just in case you thought Probabilities missed a few big names,       I'll just throw out Theodore Sturgeon, Ray Bradbury, Robert Bloch,       C. L. Moore, Murray Leinster, Stanley G. Weinbaum, Philip K. Dick,       and Algis Budrys, as well as Ursula K. LeGuin and Marion Zimmer       Bradley as science fiction luminaries whose words graced the       airwaves back in the day and the pages of this book.              It is fairly difficult to recount the stories that were related in       the interviews. The published excerpts were not long, maybe a       paragraph or two each, although if I think about it hard enough I       suspect you could get some fairly substantial stuff from one       member of the Cast or another if you put all their meanderings       together into one section. However, it is worth noting that the       wealth of material here paints a vivid picture of the growth of       the science fiction field, going all the way back to the 1920s.       The reading is fascinating to someone who is curious about the       days of the pulps, or the Golden Age of Astounding Magazine, or       even the more recent period (I will note that one writer that I       would have liked to have heard from is Michael Moorcock, but he       apparently was not interviewed on the program).              This book left a lasting impression on me. As someone who is       curious about the history of science fiction, this book is one I       didn't know I needed to read, and a terrific companion piece to       Nevala-Lee's ASTOUNDING.              Finally, there was evidence of the history of the field present at       the recent Seattle Worldcon. Robert Silverberg, who was also       mentioned in the book, was out and about at the convention and       appeared on many panels, where he did talk about some of the same       people and events discussed in the book. Richard Wolinsky, the       editor of the book, was briefly at the convention. As I wandered       around the dealers room, I came upon a table selling some of those       very same pulps that were talked about in the book. At the freebie       table, I was able to snag a couple of issues of Analog from 1968.       I snarfed those up in a heartbeat. While they were from the end of       Campbell's reign at the magazine, they contained editorials       written by Campbell, something I'd never read. Yes, the history of       the field was alive and well at Worldcon.              The modern science fiction field is where it is because of the       giants that came before it. We should all remember that. And SPACE       SHIPS! RAY GUNS! MARTIAN OCTOPODS! INTERVIEWS WITH SCIENCE FICTION       LEGENDS is there to help us with that remembering. [-jak]              ===================================================================              TOPIC: First Person Singular in History Books (comments by Evelyn       C. Leeper)              Last week I wrote that Judith Herrin had to make a lot of       assumptions and guesses about women in the Byzantine Empire and       said, "Perhaps this is why one sees the first person singular       pronoun at times; traditionally historians have eschewed it for       a more distant stance."              This week I was reading WRITING HISTORY: A GUIDE FOR STUDENTS by       William Kelleher Storey (Oxford, ISBN 978-0-19-983004-6) and he       writes, "Avoid the First Person Singular. Generally speaking,       historical writers do not write in the first person singular. ...       Usually historians employ the first person singular only when they       have personally experienced a phenomenon they are describing."              [-ecl]              ===================================================================              TOPIC: Nothing Is Easy (letters of comments by Andre Kuzniarek, Hal       Heydt, and Steve Coltrin)              In response to Evelyn's comments on how nothing is easy in the       08/22/25 issue of the MT VOID, Andre Kuzniarek writes:              Your Kafkaesque essay "Nothing is Easy" should be submitted to the       Bram Stoker or Shirley Jackson Awards as one of the most       terrifying and anxiety-producing things I've recently read--mainly       because we can all relate to it, ugh! [-ak]              Evelyn responds:              Alas, I think those submissions have to be fiction. Oh, and the              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca