Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.startrek.current    |    New Star Trek shows, movies and books    |    77,408 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 75,491 of 77,408    |
|    Jim Gysin to All    |
|    Re: Star Trek Enhanced - yanked off the     |
|    25 Oct 09 17:19:11    |
      XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv       From: jimgysin@geemail.com              Frank Frank sent the following on 10/25/2009 7:03 AM:       > aemeijers wrote:       >> Frank Frank wrote:       >>> aemeijers wrote:       >>>> Frank Frank wrote:       >>>>> Jack Bohn wrote:       >>>>>> Frank Frank wrote:       >>>>>>       >>>>>>> SFTV_troy wrote:       >>>>>>>> Has Paramount put this show back in the vault? It appears they       >>>>>>>> have,       >>>>>>>> and released TNG as a replacement.       >>>>>>> Can they do that? Stop someone airing Star Trek AFTER having sold       >>>>>>> the syndication rights to them?       >>>>>> Well, it's not so much "sold" as "rented." The rights to air are       >>>>>> probably licensed for some time frame, and then the syndicator       >>>>>> offers a new license (or not) and the stations pick it up again       >>>>>> (or not).       >>>>> Why would they not, though? If you have a product to sell and there       >>>>> is demand. It would be as if Wal-Mart decided to close its shops       >>>>> from October until next March or something like that -- what       >>>>> possible kind of business sense could that make?       >>>> Ask Disney. They do the same thing with most of their 'classic'       >>>> animated films. Last thing they want is for people to get bored with       >>>> the product. (or in the case of videos, to be competing with their       >>>> own product selling for a buck at garage sales.) About a seven-year       >>>> cycle, which is the right interval for a fresh generation of their       >>>> target demographic of kids, as well as for young parents to get past       >>>> their snotty late-teenage and college years, and be nostalgic about       >>>> the films they saw 7 or 14 years ago. TV cycle isn't that long, of       >>>> course. There isn't enough product out there for that.       >>>>       >>>> Even the digital remastering and sweetened SFX for TOS were right out       >>>> of the Disney playbook. Last go-around for most of the 'name' Disney       >>>> Classics, they trumpeted how they were 'restored' from original masters.       >>>>       >>>> Old rule of show biz- always leave them wanting more.       >>> But it's artificial scarcity. It's evil. If someone wants it now they       >>> should be able to have it now if they have the money to cover the       >>> costs (parts + labour) for providing one more marginal unit.       >> Shrug. If they don't wanna sell, you have no right to buy.       >       > No thanks to their monopoly. If one business isn't willing to       > manufacture and sell wibbles, I should have the option of buying wibbles       > from another business, really.              Why?              --       Jim Gysin       Waukesha, WI              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca